Unity of Objectivism and Subjectivism

ethnic language, nationalistic attunement with Hegelianism, Neokantianism, Lebensphilosophy, phenomenology, Heideggerianism, Marxism, and postmodernism. On the other side, more objective German philosophers stay on positions where normal, scientific standards of clarity and cross-territorial intertranslatability prevail (e.g., Humboldt, Herbart, Helmholtz, Hertz, Hilbert, coming to philosophy from some extraphilosophic disciplines). Leibniz wrote in Latin and French where German-like stylistic and meaningly disputed excesses are not known or even possible. To explain the problem of nontranslatability, Heidegger’s very artificial concepts in German can be showed. But, they may be untranslatable merely to an English reader, even the English translation of Sein und Zeit was carefully prepared by the elaboration of the German-English and the English-German dictionary before the translation. There have been not such dilemmas in translating Heidegger in other languages, e.g. to the Croatian and to the Slovenian. In contrary, these languages have been meaningly enriched not only in the usage of philosophical terminology. To reproach an ethnic language the development of specific qualities would mean to depress its developmental possibilities together with the development of consciousness, with exploring its informational contents to advance the meaning in German or in other languages. Moderate nationalism is certainly a subjective, emotional property, however it is the carrier of positive values like patriotism, home love, faithfulness of being born into a language or a nation, etc. 6. ConclusionComparing the objective meaning and the subjective meaning in the form of informons(complex meaning of something in objective and subjective sense) and entropons (setof phrases constituting the meaning of something in objective and subjective sense)concerning operand ai, look at Tab. 1, that is, an objective informon with a subjectiveone, and an objective entropon with a subjective one, a clear distinction of the objec-tive and subjective meaning is formally expressible. An ethnic language is developingthrough the expansion of meaning into new domains, being philosophical, technologi-cal, scientific and otherwise innovative. Usually, the objective gets new impulses in thesubjective and, with their interviewing, concerning new concepts, they become trans-parent and understood as something relevant for human knowledge and also for thesurvival. ReferencesARAQUE, A., V. PARPURA, R.P. SANZGIRI & P.G. HAYDON. 1999. Tripartite Synapses: Glia, the Unacknowledged Part-ner. Trends in Neuroscience 22:208–215.BEAR, W. & B.J. MITTERAUER 2013. Vorschlag zum näheren Anpassen der deutschen schriftlichen Sprache an die wis-senschaftlichen Fortschritte des letzten Jahrhunderts. grkg Humankybernetik 44:2:85–94.ŁOBACZEWSKI, A. M. 2012. Politische Ponerologie. Eine Wissenschaft über das Wesen des Bösen und ihre Anwendungfür politische Zwecke. Zweite korrigierte deutsche Auflage. Les Editions Pilule Rouge.ŁOBACZEWSKI, A.M. 2009. Political Ponerology. A science on the nature of evil adjusted to political purposes. ThirdEdition. Translated by A. Chciuk-Celt. Red Pill Press. Grande Praire, AB, Canada. Available at Les Editions Pilule Rouge.MITTERAUER, B. 2009. Architektonische Psychopatologie. grkg Humankybernetik 50:2:99–106.SMITH, B. 2001. On Forms of Communication in Philosophy. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philos-ophy. Vol. 12:73–82. Intercultural Philosophy. Eds. S. Dawson & T. Iwasawa. Philosophy Documentation Center. BowlingGreen State University. Bowling Green, OH. ŽELEZNIKAR, A.P. 2013. Informational methodology for the definition of meaning. grkg Humankybernetik 45:3:119–128.